Endothelial immunomediated reactivity in acute cardiac ischaemia: Role of endothelin 1, interleukin 8 and NT-proBNP in patients affected by unstable angina pectoris.

The role of endothelium in the progression of atheromasic disease has already been demonstrated. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is released from endothelial cells during acute and chronic vascular damage and it appears to be the strongest vasoconstrictor agent known.The aim of this study is to investigate the amount of endothelial damage in patients with unstable angina (UA), as defined by serum levels of ET-1, to verify a possible correlation with increased ischaemic damage by evaluation of serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) levels.Serum levels of ET-1, IL-8 and NT-proBNP obtained from 10 patients affected by low-risk UA were compared to those belonging to eight healthy subjects. In order to compare the laboratory data pertaining to the two populations, a Student's t-test and a Mann-Whitney U test were performed.Levels of ET-1, IL-8 and NT-proBNP in samples of peripheral blood of patients affected by UA were significantly elevated, compared with those of the control group. The linear correlation analysis demonstrated a positive and significant correlation between levels of ET-1 and IL-8, between levels of ET-1 and NT-proBNP, and between levels of IL-8 and NT-proBNP in subjects affected by UA.Early elevated levels of ET-1, IL-8 and NT-proBNP in patients with UA show a coexistence between ischaemic insults and endothelial damages. A positive and significant linear correlation between levels of ET-1 and IL-8, between levels of ET-1 and NT-proBNP, and between levels of IL-8 and NT-proBNP confirms that an increased ischaemic insult is correlated to inflammation signs and endothelium damage signs.In patients with UA, ischaemia is always associated with a systemic immuno-mediated activity induced by acute endothelial damage. We suggest early administration of ET-1-selective receptor blockers and anti-inflammatory drugs.

[Chest pain evaluation project]. / Percorso di valutazione del dolore toracico. Valutazione dei requisiti di base per l'implementazione negli ospedali italiani.

The evaluation of acute chest pain remains challenging, despite many insights and innovations over the past two decades. The percentage of patients presenting at the emergency department with acute chest pain who are subsequently admitted to the hospital appears to be increasing. Patients with acute coronary syndromes who are inadvertently discharged from the emergency department have an adverse short-term prognosis. However, the admission of a patient with chest pain who is at low risk for acute coronary syndrome can lead to unnecessary tests and procedures, with their burden of costs and complications. Therefore, with increasing economic pressures on health care, physicians and administrators are interested in improving the efficiency of care for patients with acute chest pain. Since the emergency department organization (i.e. the availability of an intensive observational area) and integration of care and treatment between emergency physicians and cardiologists greatly differ over the national territory, the purpose of the present position paper is two-fold: first, to review the evidence-based efficacy and utility of various diagnostic tools, and, second, to delineate the basic critical pathways (describing key steps for care and treatment) that need to be implemented in order to standardize and expedite the evaluation of chest pain patients, making their diagnosis and treatment as uniform as possible across the country.

[Management of acute chest pain in the emergency department]. / La gestione del dolore toracico acuto in Pronto Soccorso. La realtà attuale, le prospettive future, i punti controversi.

Acute chest pain is one of the most common symptoms in emergency departments. Immediate assessment is mandatory on arrival in order to ensure the appropriate care. Diagnostic work-up should be based on conventional tools, i.e. clinical presentation, physical examination, electrocardiogram, as well as on modern information, i.e. biochemical markers of myocardial damage or provocative tests. Firstly, physicians should assess the likelihood that signs and symptoms have a cardiac origin secondary to coronary artery disease. Afterwards, the risk for ischemic complications should be stratified. To this end, several scores have been derived from clinical trials in order to improve prediction of outcome. Also, use of critical pathways can improve guideline adherence. In the "real world", a variety of barriers to optimal management of acute chest pain still exists. An agreement on specific protocols is often difficult to achieve between different specialties. Also, no official guidelines on low-risk chest pain patients or patients with non-cardiac chest pain are available. Finally, the minimal data set of diagnostic tools that should be applied in case of acute chest pain in any emergency setting is still lacking.

Frequency and clinical correlates of changes in Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk score during observation period at emergency department in "low-risk" patients with acute chest pain.

Among 4,333 patients who were triaged in the emergency department (ED) over a 1-year period in 2003 because of acute chest pain, 1,747 (40%) were stratified as "low risk" on the basis of a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score of 0 to 2. Results showed that, during ED stay, TIMI risk score increased to > or =3 in 63% of patients and that such patients were more likely to be diabetic, hypertensive, hyperlipidemic, and smokers, and to have had previous myocardial infarction or revascularization. Patients with changes in TIMI risk score were admitted more often to the hospital, whereas more patients with unchanged TIMI risk score were discharged home directly from the ED. In conclusion, TIMI risk score may change soon after arrival to the ED in 50% of patients with acute chest pain who are initially triaged as low risk. Changes in TIMI risk score are more common in patients with multiple risk factors and/or previous diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Serial, frequent assessments of TIMI score during the ED observation period are mandatory, particularly in these subsets of patients.

Comparison of presenting features, diagnostic tools, hospital outcomes, and quality of care indicators in older (>65 years) to younger, men to women, and diabetics to nondiabetics with acute chest pain triaged in the emergency department.

In a total of 4,843 consecutive patients admitted to an emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain over a 1-year period, presenting features, diagnostic tools, hospital outcomes, and quality-of-care indicators were compared between older (n = 1,781) and younger (n = 3,062) patients, men (n = 3,095) and women (n = 1,748), and diabetics (n = 856) and nondiabetics (n = 3,987). The results showed that after critical pathway implementation, there was an increase in the use of evidence-based treatment strategies in the ED and improved outcomes in older patients, women, and diabetics, with no more differences in the length of ED stay, diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction in the ED, door-to-thrombolysis time, and door-to-balloon time compared with younger patients, men, and nondiabetics.

Efficacy and safety of ibutilide vs. transoesophageal atrial pacing for the termination of type I atrial flutter.

AIMS: Comparing efficacy and safety of ibutilide vs. transoesophageal atrial pacing (ATP) for the termination of type I atrial flutter (AFL). METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients affected by AFL lasting between 2 h and 30 days were randomized in two groups: Group 1-i.v. ibutilide treatment, up to 2 mg, and Group 2-ATP, with "burst" and "ramp" pacing protocols. Sinus rhythm was restored in 36/45 (80%) patients in Group 1 vs. 18/42 (43%) in Group 2 (P<0.0005). In Group 1, mean AFL duration was 11.4 +/- 7.7 days in responders vs. 12.1 +/- 7.6 in non-responders (P=ns), while in Group 2 it was 2.7 +/- 1.4 vs. 14.2 +/- 5.4 days (responders vs. non-responders, respectively, P<0.0001); 30/36 (83%) responders in Group 1 had AFL >48 h vs. 10/18 (56%) responders in Group 2 (P<0.05). Non-sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia occurred in 2 patients in Group 1 vs. none in Group 2 (P=ns). It did not require any specific treatment except the interruption of ibutilide infusion. CONCLUSION: Both ibutilide and ATP proved to be safe and effective for recent onset type I AFL termination, but ibutilide was more effective when the arrhythmia had lasted longer than 48 h.

Critical pathways in the emergency department improve treatment modalities for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a European hospital.

BACKGROUND: The use of protocols for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) is growing, but no definite conclusion regarding the value of critical pathways in Europe has been drawn. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of critical pathway on processes of care and outcome for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) of a large urban European hospital because of possible ST-elevation MI. METHODS: Critical pathways for management of acute chest pain at our ED were developed in 1998 and have been revised every year. Accordingly, the records of all patients referred in 1997 to the ED because of chest pain (before pathway implementation) and in 2001 (after last pathway revision) were reviewed. An ST-elevation MI was diagnosed at ED in 520 of 5,066 (10.3%) patients with chest pain in 1997, and in 452 of 4,843 (9.3%) patients with chest pain in 2001. Patients were managed according to the ED cardiologists' decisions in 1997, whereas they entered the pathways for ST-elevation MI in 2001, with predefined criteria for diagnosis, thrombolysis, percutaneous coronary intervention, and admission to the coronary care unit. RESULTS: Comparison of treatment modalities disclosed that more patients were given thrombolysis in 1997 (49 vs. 16%, p<0.05), whereas in 2001 more patients were sent to primary angioplasty (63 vs. 11%, p<0.05). Also in 2001, patients more often received aspirin (90 vs. 61%, p<0.05) and intravenous beta blockers (60 vs. 35%, p<0.05) soon after arrival at the ED. Comparison between 1997 and 2001 revealed that admission rates to the coronary care unit (69 vs. 78%, NS) and cardiac wards were similar (19 vs. 10%, NS). Conversely, compared with 1997, patients hospitalized in 2001 had a shorter length of stay (12 +/- 5 vs. 18 +/- 6 days, p<0.05), as well as fewer major adverse coronary events (21 vs. 30%, p<0.05) and lower all-cause in-hospital mortality (12 vs. 20%, p<0.05). The quality of care indicators improved with time, as door-to-electrocardiogram interval (10 +/- 6 vs. 19 +/- 9 min, p<0.05), door-to-needle time (25 +/- 10 vs. 35 +/- 10 min, p<0.05), and door-to-balloon interval (70 +/- 15 vs. 99 +/- 20 min, p<0.05) were shorter in 2001 than in 1997. CONCLUSIONS: A critical pathway for ST-elevation MI at the ED increases the use of evidence-based treatment strategies and improves outcome and quality of care of patients presenting to a European hospital because of acute chest pain.

[Unusual evolution of myopericarditis: a case report]. / Inusuale evoluzione di una miopericardite. Descrizione di un caso clinico.

Presenting features of constrictive pericarditis, a rare evolution of acute pericardial inflammation, may resemble those of restrictive cardiomyopathy or liver diseases. We describe the case of a 32-year-old man, with a history of myocardial and pericardial inflammation disease, who showed recurrent symptoms and signs of heart failure. For this reason, he underwent complete diagnostic evaluation, including computed tomography, echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging, and endomyocardial biopsy. Constrictive pericarditis could be correctly diagnosed and the patient underwent pericardiectomy with complete resolution of heart failure. The present case report provides evidence that tissue Doppler echocardiography yields diagnostic information helpful to differentiate between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. Moreover, non-invasive imaging is of value to choose the optimal therapeutic strategy in constrictive cardiomyopathy.

[First-aid treatment for acute myocardial infarction. Experience at the San Camillo Hospital of Rome]. / Trattamento in pronto soccorso dell'infarto acuto del miocardio. L'esperienza dell'Ospedale San Camillo di Roma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to verify: 1) the trustworthiness level of the diagnosis of AMI defined in Emergency Department (ER); 2) the frequency and the effectiveness (length of staying in hospital, mortality rate) of the invasive or not invasive treatment which are implemented in the ER area. METHODS: We have studied the crowding of the patients suffering from chest pain (CP) who asked the ER for assistance during the year 2000 and that of the patients with AMI diagnosed in ER (diagnosis at the admittance and at the discharge from the hospital, therapeutic procedures, staying in hospital, mortality rate). RESULTS: The patients suffering from CP have been the 5.4% of all the patients who reached the ER and were admitted to the hospital more than the patients who reached the ER for all the other causes (41.5% versus 22.1%). In 61.7% of the patients affected by AMI the disease was identified by the physicians of the ER; the invasive treatment has been developed in 67.7% of those patients and the not invasive in 32.3% of the same patients. The mean length of the staying in hospital for the patients who have been treated with PTCA was 10.3 days; on the contrary, the same value for the patients treated with thrombolysis was 13.8 days and the difference was significant at the 0.001 level. The mortality rate during the staying in Hospital was 5.9% in the patients treated with PTCA and 13% in the patients treated with thrombolysis but the difference was not significant because of the little number of the dead patients. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity (62%) and the specificity (100%) of the diagnosis of AMI defined in the ER demonstrate the utility of a Cardiologic Service in ER.